Not Dead Yet - JAMES BULGER'S KILLER BACK IN PRISON
leer
Not Dead Yet - The voice of the over-50s
The voice of the Over-Fifties The voice of senior citizens
The voice of the over-50s
Home arrow Forum arrow Senior Topicsarrow Current Affairsarrow JAMES BULGER'S KILLER BACK IN PRISON
Erfurt live Header10 Erfurt live leer0
Main Menu
Home
Personal Pages
Forum
Live Chat
Contact Us
Search
Terms & Conditions
Personal Pages Help
Useful Links
Seniors Petition
Who's Online
We have 30 guests online
Live Joomla Chat
  • Chatroom Empty
Advertisement
Not Dead Yet - Forum
February 07, 2012, 11:56:13 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: SMF - Just Installed!
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: JAMES BULGER'S KILLER BACK IN PRISON  (Read 2527 times)
Rie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1678
« on: March 03, 2010, 09:03:37 AM »


ONE of James Bulger?s killers was back behind bars last night after breaching the conditions of his release from prison.

Jon Venables, 27, was just 10 when he carried out the horrific abduction and murder of the two-year-old in 1993 along with Robert Thompson.

He was released from custody in 2001 on a life licence but has been recalled to jail following the breach, a Ministry of Justice spokeswoman said yesterday.

In a statement she said: ?We can confirm that Jon Venables has been recalled to custody following a breach of licence conditions. Offenders on licence are subject to strict conditions. If they breach those conditions they are subject to immediate recall.?

The spokeswoman refused to give details of the breach or the conditions of Venables? release. But barrister and criminal law expert Michael Wolkind QC said he thought there was a ?significant chance? the breach had been serious.

http://bit.ly/deY9Gx
Logged
Illegitimi non carborundum.
dalerite
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1697
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2010, 10:35:21 AM »
I GET THE FEELING RIE THAT THIS CHAP IS DESTINED TO BE A HARDENED CRIMINAL.WE SHALL NO DOUBT GET TO KNOW WHAT HE HAS DONE WRONG.
Logged
Rie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1678
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2010, 11:57:22 AM »
They should never have been released. Its awful for the poor family.
Logged
Illegitimi non carborundum.
Phoenix
Guest
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2010, 05:33:12 PM »
To take a persons Life, should equate, to the forfiture of one's own. How else could that be resolved. HuhHuh
Logged
macushla
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1814
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2010, 06:47:49 PM »
I feel so sorry for Jamies mother,these boys should have been hung boys or no boys they are rotten to the core.
What they did was inhumane and unforgivable.
Logged
dalerite
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1697
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2010, 10:05:15 AM »
I DONT THINK THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN LET OUT OF PRISON.I THINK CAPITAL PUNISHMENT WOULD ACT AS A DETERRENT TO SOME OF THESE PEOPLE.
Logged
Phoenix
Guest
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2010, 11:45:00 PM »
As you say,there should be no doubt they should stay in prison for Life, for their terrible crime. I agree that capital punishment should be the answer and a deterent, to othere's, hopefully to make 'those'  think again.
Logged
Hammer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 366
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2010, 04:41:28 PM »
Quote from: Pumicestone on June 19, 2010, 03:46:39 PM
We all feel rightly horrified at this sort of crime - and it is human nature to seek retribution.
But let us not kid ourselves about deterrent value.
Statistics simply do not support that view.
The very few countries which still kill offenders have HIGHER murder rates than those which do not.
Studies suggest that it is counter-productive.
Rape and robery victims will more often be killed to avoid identifying the pepetrator if the perp thinks he/they could face the death penalty.

How old were these offenders when that terrible crime was committed ?
Would you REALLY execute offenders of that age ?
How ?
Hang them, shoot them, draw and quarter ..... ?

It has nothing at all to do with retribution, it is to try and protect our children and grandkids from evil creatures such as these two. For this reason alone they should by all that is right both still be locked away
What you and the bleeding heart human rights brigade always forget to consider is the victim.
In this case an innocent and trusting lad brutally had his human rights taken from him and not just by a random act, it was a planned attack by two lads who knew exactly what they were doing.
Jamie was tortured and beaten to death by means far too graphic to have ever been reported properly in  the press. If you doubt that then read the trial transcript, if you can stomach the horror of it.

As far as a deterrent goes, It is ridiculous to suggest anyone would seriously advocate the death sentence for a minor, a life sentence to mean just that with no chance of parole might just be a suitable alternative.

I would however be very interested to read the source of your ' studies and statistics '
Logged
Blessed is the man who expects nothing, for he shall never be disappointed, especially if he supports West Ham United FC.
Phoenix
Guest
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2010, 11:19:45 PM »
What a complete waste of money, to 'lock a murderer up for Life'. Should a person take another's Life, for any reason, that is a criminal act and against the law, then that persons life should be forfeit. The prisons are absolutely Full and some criminals are being let out, or not even being sent to jail. -- Just what does that actually Teach people HuhHuhHuh
Logged
Hammer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 366
« Reply #9 on: June 20, 2010, 11:46:44 AM »
Quote from: Phoenix on June 19, 2010, 11:19:45 PM
What a complete waste of money, to 'lock a murderer up for Life'. Should a person take another's Life, for any reason, that is a criminal act and against the law, then that persons life should be forfeit. The prisons are absolutely Full and some criminals are being let out, or not even being sent to jail. -- Just what does that actually Teach people HuhHuhHuh
Hi Phoenix, I am not against the restoration of Capital Punishment but I think we have to be a little more discerning on who we execute.
Not all that long ago we murdered Derek Bentley for being present at the time Chris Craig shot a bobby.
As you will remember Craig was only 16 at the time and could not legally be hung. Derek was used as a scapegoat to salve the public outrage of a policeman being killed which was at that time a very rare event.

We have moved on from that standpoint and we must not countenance the killing of children. To lock them up would seem to be a logical alternative.
Logged
Blessed is the man who expects nothing, for he shall never be disappointed, especially if he supports West Ham United FC.
Phoenix
Guest
« Reply #10 on: June 20, 2010, 09:55:09 PM »
At the time it was stated the Derek Bentley said to Chris Craig - "Give It To Him"   referring to the gun of course. But ?? did Chris interpret that as meaning 'Shoot Him' we shall possibly never know the truth, of that meaning. So of course, as a Policeman was killed, someone had to pay the penalty. A rare event but non the less, serious. We are all aware that Twelve persons mak up the jury and their is the ultimate decision. Who are we, the public to decide who and why should one pay the price. Something needs to be done, when innocent people get killed for defending their Homes and Family. Any Suggestions HuhHuhHuh   
Logged
macushla
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1814
« Reply #11 on: June 20, 2010, 10:33:19 PM »
Many Phoenix but they wont listen ! Undecided
Logged
Phoenix
Guest
« Reply #12 on: June 20, 2010, 10:35:35 PM »
True!! that is why there are so very many 'Repeat crimes' again and again. There is No Deterent.
Logged
Pepe
Newbie
*
Posts: 7
« Reply #13 on: June 26, 2010, 02:20:09 AM »
Shoot the buggers and have done with.
At least we wont have millions of our tax dollars supporting them for the rest of their lives....in luxury I might add.
Anybody scream Human Rights....well, they forfit that when they took a life.
an eye for an eye.....but i am not religeous!
Logged
Pepe
Newbie
*
Posts: 7
« Reply #14 on: June 26, 2010, 10:16:07 AM »
I take it you are saying/suggesting/implying that Bulger is innocent?
you probably think Myra Hindley was "framed" too!
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com 		Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
You're Not Dead Yet - Find a Companion
Executive Pen Shop
Big Bag Co
Erfurt live leer
Erfurt live unten Erfurt live leer Erfurt live unten

Site by: Masonhost Web Design, Glasgow.